Andy Beshear, aka Baby Beshear,
Kentucky's Democratic candidate for Attorney General, has vowed to
fight against child abuse. He's going to strengthen the laws, which
is great news. In fact, Julie Adams of Louisville, a female
Republican state senator got some child abuse laws passed this past
year. Now, because of Adams' efforts, if you beat a baby to death,
you'll be charged with murder. Apparently, Kentucky didn't think that beating a baby to death was murder. I'm glad that's changed. But that's the Republicans in Frankfort passing laws
strengthening provisions that protect children from getting abused,
mentally, physically, emotionally, and sexually from their parents.
This is great news! This is something both parties can rally behind,
and stop. Child abuse does nobody any good. Children aren't pets we
own. Children are “catch-and-release”. It's like you caught
yourselves a wild wolf, and it's a parents job to get them to
function property in society. Roots and Wings. You own a pet until it
dies. You don't own your own children until they die. They aren't
property. They are themselves. And eventually, when they turn 18
years old, they become adults, and are expected to be radically
self-reliant. They should fly from the nest, not just pushed out. We
want our children to be able to get a job, and do well in this world.
We don't want them to be penned up in the yard, begging for scraps of
food, until the day they die. We want them to be smart, intelligent,
savvy, clever, autonomous, independent. We want them to kick ass and take names. To not take any bullshit from anybody. But how can they be all that they can be, when taking bullshit is all that you taught them, and all that they know?
But there's areas in Kentucky who love
hitting children. That's what they do on their days off from work.
Child beaters get together, and they beat children up. Usually it's
husband and wives, hitting children behind closed doors in their own
house. “Everyone thinks that we're perfect. Please don't let them
look through the curtains.” When they're not waving their
confederate flags, talking about “niggers”, and dreaming about
when the south is gonna rise agin, they're smacking children around.
For poor stupid powerless people, it's the only power they feel, and
they love it! But what sucks for those areas of Kentucky, is that
since even the Republicans are passing laws in Frankfort
strengthening legal protections for children, this means that the
child-beaters don't have any political party to go to. These pockets
of child abusers are now all alone, on a deserted island somewhere,
fighting against their own flesh and blood, just for the fuck of it. Just to feel powerful. Just to take out their frustrating bad day on somebody they view as inferior to them. Not because they thought
carefully about how they were going to raise their children, or
because they wanted to put their parenthood plans into action, no, no, no. It's
because they're lazy. It's because they're lazy, and because their
parents hit them, and clearly, they turned out okay, so what's the
problem?
Well, the problem is that you don't
empathize with children being hit. What about adults? What about
women? Is it okay for a child to hit an adult? No? Really? How about,
is it acceptable for one adult to pummel another adult, say, like a
punch in the face? No on that one too? Now, now, now. You can't do
that. You must pick one or the other. If you can hit children, and
they can't hit... well, first of all, the fight isn't even fair,
since, you know, kids are like 50 pounds and shorter than 5 feet, but
now, you're allowed to hit defenseless human beings, without even the
possibility or threat of being hit back? Wtf?
A part of me just wants to say “fuck
'em”, because they're ruining their own progeny, but when your
abused child attacks my child, then it's over for them, and their
abusers, and maybe, that's what's best for everybody all around. As a
society, we don't want to have a bunch of broken individuals, who
don't know real love, who don't know who they are, or why nobody
gives a shit that they were bullied and pummeled, and then they lash
out, not at the perpetrators, but at innocents folks, weak folks,
folks they believe to be inferior to them, folks they can get away
with treating like shit, since, that's exactly what they were trained
to do.
The true measure of a society is how
well they treat their children. Mortality rates help too. Because of
child abuse, is it any wonder that there's so much domestic violence,
elder abuse, police brutality, prison rapes, and war in general?
Child abuse proves that might makes right, which means that violence
DOES solve problems! That's what violent people teach their own
children. If the child isn't of the age of reason, then they don't
know why you're hitting them. If the child is of the age of reason,
then talk to them. The best way to calm an out of control child: talk
to them.
But for a child abuser, that's beyond
their understanding of the world. It's also so time consuming! If you
talk to children, then you must speak to them at their level, and
then, after you say what you wanted to say, they may even talk back
to you! OMG! Did you hear what I just said? “Talk back”... ie
“backtalk”, as in, “Don't backtalk me, boy.” Okay, great.
Wonderful. “Backtalk” is just me responding to what you just said
to me, and since the world is divided amongst oppressors and the
oppressed, then Americans are training their children, by the bushel,
to be always be the oppressed. To never stand up
for themselves, or others. To train their conscience to become immune
to injustice. To watch a victim get victimized, and to not say
anything. Like a gazelle who just got caught by a lion. Like when a
civilian gets pulled over for speeding. To take the side of the
oppressor. Silence is betrayal. If you remain neutral during
situations of injustice, then you have taken the side of the
oppressor (Desmond Tutu). MLK quoted Dante as saying, “The hottest
places in hell are reserved for those who in period of moral crisis
who maintain their neutrality.”
Adam Edelen, Kentucky's Democratic
candidate for State Auditor, is also speaking out against child
abuse. Adam Edelen and Baby Beshear! Adam Edelen is the Michael
Jordan of Southern Democrat politics. It seems to be one of the few
issues these 2 major candidates have chosen to speak about, and wow.
Evidently, they believed that there's other Kentuckians who believe
that child abuse is wrong, and I must admit, that's quite comforting.
For too long, I've been alone. Alone during my childhood, being
bullied, and alone in my adulthood, coping, healing, strengthening
that which happened during my formative years. Plus dealing with an
unjust criminal justice system that would rather punish the victims
of abusers, instead of the abusers themselves. Baby Beshear would fix
that. He would be the Attorney General, enforcer of the law, and
sometimes, the writer of policy, when the policy is murky. Adam
Edelen should kick his opponent's ass, because Edelen rocks, and Mike
Harmon ain't shit, and rightfully so, since Edelen is going to be
President one day. I thought 5 issues was a good number, for my
Lieutenant Governor's race, I had 10 for my state representative
race... in both races, playing a numbers game, telling the truth,
you'll get 20-21% of the vote of the electorate. Just by playing the
numbers. I'd like to win the next time I run, but I saw a man in
need, and helped him out. Helping him also helped me, somewhat.
Edelen audits the shit outta everybody,
is honest, cleaned Richie Farmer up, “put him through the warsh”,
as ol' Will T. would say, speaks in favor of ObamaCare, and says that
those who are anti-ObamaCare are anti-Christian. Here's two more
quotes of Edelen's:
“Stick out your chin,
Matt [Bevin], this one's gonna hurt.”
“Put down the books of
Ayn Rand, and pick up the books of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John!”
So child abuse... yeah. Child abuse is
bullshit. It's such bullshit. Violence is bullshit. Violence,
Stealing, Rape, and Murder are the 4 worst crimes one person can
inflict upon another person, and yet, one of the 4 most wicked things
we can do to each other, we allow, some encourage, others celebrate
and champion, the use of violence against their children, and like
the police, they hit first, and ask questions later. If the child
isn't of the age of reason, then you hitting them doesn't mean shit,
because they don't know why you're hitting them. If the child is of
reason, then fuck'n reason with them! Goddamnit! How is that not
obvious? Because children are catch-and-release, it is upon society
to care about how children are being treated in their own homes. It
does take a village, because a child who goes psycho on others, for
whatever reasons, is detrimental to society, and so broken parents
who multiply with broken children do a disservice to us all. Sure,
you have a right to raise your children however you want to raise
them, but when your child hits my child, because you're an abusive
parent, then I have a problem with the job of parenting that you're
clearly not doing. It's harder to talk to your children, to reason
with them, to make them understand, but it's better for them, to not
be beating the shit out of them, because they understand. It's also
better for you.
Children should be easy to raise.
Because children are naïve, trusting, innocent, and because you are
bigger than them, children just want to appeal to you. They want you
to like them. Just you not liking them can get them to do what you
want... my God... I mean, how easy would it to be a minimalist
parent, watching your child do for themselves, think for themselves,
and govern their own lives? You get to watch your child's personality
blossom, and then you can make subtle suggestions about the bigger
questions of life, inspire them to become something great, a doctor,
or an engineer, or a movie star, or whatever dreams they truly hold
onto. This is America, so why keep on doing Bronze Age shit? Why
allow the cloak of religion to numb you to be so immune, that you
aren't even able to love your own children? And we're allowing
violent psychopaths to hit children “for their own good”? Does
that make sense to anybody?
Comments
Post a Comment